Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330

Place in the ranking	1304	626
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	14.11
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code name	M92	DG1
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	9 January 2009 (16 years ago)	31 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	768
Core clock speed	450 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	242 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.600	79.20
Floating-point processing power	0.072 TFLOPS	2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	24
TMUs	8	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

PCIe 4.0 x4

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	600 MHz	2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth	9.6 GB/s	68.26 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −2600%	27 +2600%
1440p	1−2 −1900%	20 +1900%
4K	1−2 −1500%	16 +1500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −133%	7 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −550%	39 +550%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −725%	33 +725%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6 +100%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −383%	29 +383%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −450%	33 +450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −514%	40−45 +514%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −125%	9 +125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
World of Tanks	12−14 −546%	80−85 +546%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −600%	42 +600%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −383%	29 +383%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −514%	40−45 +514%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−1550%

30−35
+1550%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Valorant	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −13.3%	16−18 +13.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −1400%	14−16 +1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	4−5
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	14−16 −33.3%	20 +33.3%
Valorant	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring

14−16

+0%

14−16

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	23 +0%	23 +0%
Valorant	29 +0%	29 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Dota 2	27 +0%	27 +0%
Elden Ring	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Fortnite	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	20 +0%	20 +0%
Metro Exodus	18 +0%	18 +0%
Valorant	15 +0%	15 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Dota 2	38 +0%	38 +0%
Valorant	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Elden Ring	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
World of Tanks	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	20 +0%	20 +0%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
High Preset

Elden Ring	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Fortnite	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	11 +0%	11 +0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4330 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compete in popular games:

Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 2600% faster in 1080p
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 1900% faster in 1440p
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 1500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 1550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Iris Xe MAX Graphics is ahead in 30 tests (50%)
there's a draw in 30 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.34	5.13
Recency	9 January 2009	31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	10 nm

Iris Xe MAX Graphics has a 1408.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.