GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4330 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 4330
2009
512 MB GDDR3
0.30

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Mobility HD 4330 by a whopping 5777% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1361319
Place by popularitynot in top-10095
Power efficiencyno data28.39
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameM92TU116
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 January 2009 (16 years ago)23 April 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores801024
Core clock speed450 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors242 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60095.04
Floating-point processing power0.072 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
L1 Cache16 KB1 MB
L2 Cache64 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI Mobility HD 4330 0.30
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 17.63
+5777%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI Mobility HD 4330 656
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517
+6534%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−158
1440p0−144
4K-0−124

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5800%
59
+5800%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1040%
57
+1040%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4500%
46
+4500%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1825%
75−80
+1825%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−740%
42
+740%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−929%
70−75
+929%
Valorant 24−27
−596%
181
+596%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−1543%
230−240
+1543%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3500%
36
+3500%
Dota 2 10−11
−1090%
119
+1090%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1825%
75−80
+1825%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−540%
32
+540%
Metro Exodus 0−1 38
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−929%
70−75
+929%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1340%
72
+1340%
Valorant 24−27
−592%
180
+592%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3300%
34
+3300%
Dota 2 10−11
−1020%
112
+1020%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1825%
75−80
+1825%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−340%
22
+340%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−929%
70−75
+929%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−680%
39
+680%
Valorant 24−27
−450%
140−150
+450%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1850%
35−40
+1850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5567%
170−180
+5567%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4600%
45−50
+4600%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 21−24
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 27−30

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 41

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Valorant 2−3
−4100%
84
+4100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−550%
13
+550%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 123
+0%
123
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Far Cry 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Fortnite 121
+0%
121
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 78
+0%
78
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 69
+0%
69
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Fortnite 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+0%
76
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Far Cry 5 58
+0%
58
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 69
+0%
69
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 164
+0%
164
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+0%
25
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 5800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile performs better in 29 tests (47%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (53%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 17.63
Recency 9 January 2009 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has a 5776.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330
Mobility Radeon HD 4330
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 53 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1918 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4330 or GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.