GeForce4 MX 460 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 with GeForce4 MX 460, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 3870 X2
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 110 Watt
2.09
+20800%

Mobility HD 3870 X2 outperforms MX 460 by a whopping 20800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9231586
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.46no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameM88NV17 A3
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2008 (17 years ago)6 February 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320 ×2no data
Core clock speed660 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors666 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.56 ×21.200
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs16 ×22
TMUs16 ×24
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB ×264 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed850 MHz225 MHz
Memory bandwidth54.4 GB/s ×27.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)8.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1
Valorant 40−45 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Valorant 40−45 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Valorant 40−45 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−11 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 0−1
Valorant 14−16 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 10−11 0−1

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.09 0.01
Recency 1 September 2008 6 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm

ATI Mobility HD 3870 X2 has a 20800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 MX 460 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce4 MX 460 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 460
GeForce4 MX 460

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 12 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 or GeForce4 MX 460, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.