GeForce PCX 4300 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1301not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.82no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameM86NV19
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2008 (17 years ago)19 February 2004 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120no data
Core clock speed500 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors378 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.0000.5
Floating-point processing power0.12 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs82

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)8.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2008 19 February 2004
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm

ATI Mobility HD 3650 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 3650 and GeForce PCX 4300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is a notebook card while GeForce PCX 4300 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
NVIDIA GeForce PCX 4300
GeForce PCX 4300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 39 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate GeForce PCX 4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3650 or GeForce PCX 4300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.