GeForce 8400M GT vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3650 and GeForce 8400M GT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 3650
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 30 Watt
0.34
+113%

ATI Mobility HD 3650 outperforms 8400M GT by a whopping 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13071430
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.800.86
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameM86G86
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2008 (17 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12016
Core clock speed500 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors378 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0003.600
Floating-point processing power0.12 TFLOPS0.0288 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s19.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the ATI Mobility HD 3650 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 3650 is ahead in 16 tests (53%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 0.16
Recency 7 January 2008 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 55 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 14 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3650 has a 112.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

8400M GT, on the other hand, has 114.3% lower power consumption.

The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400M GT in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT
GeForce 8400M GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9
40 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5
22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3650 or GeForce 8400M GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.