UHD Graphics vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3470 and UHD Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 3470
2008
256 MB DDR2, 12 Watt
0.23

Graphics outperforms Mobility HD 3470 by a whopping 2165% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1448677
Place by popularitynot in top-1003
Power efficiency1.4139.58
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameM82Jasper Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2008 (18 years ago)11 January 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40256
Core clock speed680 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors181 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate2.72012.00
Floating-point processing power0.0544 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs416
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI Mobility HD 3470 0.23
UHD Graphics 5.21
+2165%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI Mobility HD 3470 93
UHD Graphics 2151
+2213%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
Valorant 24−27
−2100%
550−600
+2100%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−2150%
270−280
+2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Dota 2 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Valorant 24−27
−2100%
550−600
+2100%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Dota 2 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Valorant 24−27
−2100%
550−600
+2100%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Valorant 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 5.21
Recency 7 January 2008 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 10 Watt

UHD Graphics has a 2165% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3470 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 63 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 10731 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3470 or UHD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.