UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3470 and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 3470
2008
256 MB DDR2, 12 Watt
0.22

Graphics 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms Mobility HD 3470 by a whopping 859% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1433915
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.41no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameM82Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2008 (17 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4016
Core clock speed680 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors181 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Wattno data
Texture fill rate2.720no data
Floating-point processing power0.0544 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2no data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112_1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−1000%
11
+1000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Valorant 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−258%
40−45
+258%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 9−10
−156%
23
+156%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−80%
9
+80%
Valorant 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 9−10
−144%
22
+144%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Valorant 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 23
+0%
23
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10
+0%
10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
Far Cry 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9
+0%
9
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5
+0%
5
+0%
Far Cry 5 7
+0%
7
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
+0%
6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 3470 and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 1000% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) performs better in 29 tests (53%)
  • there's a draw in 26 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.22 2.11
Recency 7 January 2008 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 859.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3470 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470
Mobility Radeon HD 3470
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 62 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 391 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3470 or UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.