A10G vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT with A10G, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 2600 XT
2007
256 MB GDDR3
0.32

A10G outperforms Mobility HD 2600 XT by a whopping 10063% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1382183
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.69
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameM76GA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 May 2007 (18 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1209216
Core clock speed680 MHz1320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1710 MHz
Number of transistors390 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate5.440492.5
Floating-point processing power0.1632 TFLOPS31.52 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8288
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cacheno data9 MB
L2 Cache64 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz1563 MHz
Memory bandwidth24 GB/s600.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−9900%
400−450
+9900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−9900%
700−750
+9900%
Valorant 24−27
−9900%
2600−2650
+9900%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−9900%
1400−1450
+9900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%
Dota 2 10−11
−9900%
1000−1050
+9900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−9900%
400−450
+9900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−9900%
700−750
+9900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−9900%
500−550
+9900%
Valorant 24−27
−9900%
2600−2650
+9900%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%
Dota 2 10−11
−9900%
1000−1050
+9900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−9900%
400−450
+9900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−9900%
700−750
+9900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−9900%
500−550
+9900%
Valorant 24−27
−9900%
2600−2650
+9900%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−9900%
1400−1450
+9900%
Valorant 2−3
−9900%
200−210
+9900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−9900%
200−210
+9900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 32.52
Recency 14 May 2007 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm

A10G has a 10063% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 713% more advanced lithography process.

The A10G is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is a notebook graphics card while A10G is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 49 votes

Rate A10G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT or A10G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.