ATI Rage PRO Turbo AGP vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRage 3 (1997−1998)
GPU code nameRS350Rage 3 Turbo
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 June 2003 (21 year ago)1 March 1997 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3no data
Core clock speed1 MHz75 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistors76 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm350 nm
Texture fill rate0.60.08

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xAGP 2x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data75 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data600.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.16.0
OpenGL1.41.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 June 2003 1 March 1997
Chip lithography 150 nm 350 nm

ATI Mobility 9100 IGP has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP and Rage PRO Turbo AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP is a notebook card while Rage PRO Turbo AGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP
ATI Rage PRO Turbo AGP
Rage PRO Turbo AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 34 votes

Rate Rage PRO Turbo AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.