ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Maxwell GPU Surface Book and Mobility Radeon HD 3850, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Maxwell GPU Surface Book
2015
1 GB GDDR5
3.69
+443%

Maxwell GPU Surface Book outperforms ATI Mobility HD 3850 by a whopping 443% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7121177
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.33
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameSurface BookM88
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 October 2015 (9 years ago)4 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384320
Core clock speed954 MHz580 MHz
Boost clock speed993 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data666 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data9.280
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3712 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data48 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24
+500%
4−5
−500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Battlefield 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Hitman 3 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+136%
10−12
−136%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Battlefield 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Hitman 3 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+136%
10−12
−136%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Hitman 3 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+136%
10−12
−136%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
Hitman 3 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how Maxwell GPU Surface Book and ATI Mobility HD 3850 compete in popular games:

  • Maxwell GPU Surface Book is 500% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Maxwell GPU Surface Book is 1050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Maxwell GPU Surface Book surpassed ATI Mobility HD 3850 in all 35 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.69 0.68
Recency 1 October 2015 4 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

Maxwell GPU Surface Book has a 442.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Maxwell GPU Surface Book is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book
Maxwell GPU Surface Book
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850
Mobility Radeon HD 3850

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 6 votes

Rate Maxwell GPU Surface Book on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.