UHD Graphics vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) and UHD Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
2015
1 GB GDDR5
3.17

UHD Graphics outperforms Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking731622
Place by popularitynot in top-1005
Power efficiencyno data38.13
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameSurface BookJasper Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 October 2015 (9 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384256
Core clock speed954 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed993 MHz750 MHz
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5012 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Fortnite 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
−50.8%
95−100
+50.8%
Dota 2 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Fortnite 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Dota 2 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

This is how Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) and UHD Graphics compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics is 43% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.17 4.81
Recency 1 October 2015 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics has a 51.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7460 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) or UHD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.