GeForce RTX 3090 vs Matrox QID PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated19
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.79
ArchitectureMP (2004)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameMP-A4Ampere GA102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 December 2004 (19 years ago)24 September 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,499
Current price$1074 $1198 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data10496
Core clock speed250 MHz1400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology0 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data350 Watt
Texture fill rate2.000556.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCI-XPCIe 4.0 x16
Length191 mm313 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount256 MB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz19500 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s936.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x LFH601x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.54.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDAno data8.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 December 2004 24 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 24 GB

We couldn't decide between Matrox QID PRO and GeForce RTX 3090. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox QID PRO
QID PRO
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox QID PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 78590 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.