Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU vs Matrox QID PRO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMP (2004)no data
GPU code nameMP-A4no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 December 2004 (19 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data30
Core clock speed250 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology0 nm5 nm
Texture fill rate2.000no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCI-Xno data
Length191 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRLPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed300 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x LFH60no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.1no data
OpenGL1.5no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 December 2004 17 January 2023

Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU has an age advantage of 18 years.

We couldn't decide between Matrox QID PRO and Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox QID PRO is a desktop card while Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox QID PRO
QID PRO
Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU
M2 Max 30-Core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox QID PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 112 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.