Radeon Pro W6800X vs Matrox Mystique G200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated102
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.98
Power efficiencyno data13.95
ArchitectureG200 (1998−1999)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameEclipseNavi 21
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1998 (26 years ago)3 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3840
Core clock speed84 MHz1800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2087 MHz
Number of transistors10 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data200 Watt
Texture fill rate0.08500.9
Floating-point processing powerno data16.03 TFLOPS
ROPs196
TMUs1240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xApple MPX
Length150 mm267 mm
Width1-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneApple MPX

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 MB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed112 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth896.0 MB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 7 nm

Pro W6800X has a 409500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Mystique G200 and Radeon Pro W6800X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Mystique G200 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W6800X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Mystique G200
Mystique G200
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X
Radeon Pro W6800X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 11 votes

Rate Matrox Mystique G200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 20 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.