RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Matrox Millennium G400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated72
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data81.77
Power efficiencyno data45.72
ArchitectureG400 (1999−2002)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameToucanAD107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date20 May 1999 (25 years ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2816
Core clock speed125 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2130 MHz
Number of transistors10 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rate0.25187.4
Floating-point processing powerno data12 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs288
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x8
Length150 mm168 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 May 1999 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 5 nm

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has an age advantage of 24 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Millennium G400 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Millennium G400 is a desktop card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Millennium G400
Millennium G400
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Matrox Millennium G400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 26 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.