Radeon Pro W6600M vs Matrox Marvel G400-TV

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated221
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.98
ArchitectureG400 (1999−2002)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameToucanNavi 23
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date20 May 1999 (25 years ago)8 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1792
Core clock speed125 MHz1224 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2034 MHz
Number of transistors10 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data90 Watt
Texture fill rate0.25227.8
Floating-point processing powerno data7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs2112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
Length150 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 May 1999 8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 7 nm

Pro W6600M has an age advantage of 22 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Marvel G400-TV and Radeon Pro W6600M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Marvel G400-TV is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Marvel G400-TV
Marvel G400-TV
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Marvel G400-TV on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.