Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs Matrox Marvel G400-TV

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.26
ArchitectureG400 (1999−2002)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameToucanDG1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date20 May 1999 (25 years ago)31 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed125 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors10 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology250 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rate0.2579.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs224
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x4
Length150 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRLPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount16 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz4.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s68.26 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 May 1999 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 10 nm

Iris Xe Graphics MAX has an age advantage of 21 year, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Marvel G400-TV and Iris Xe Graphics MAX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Marvel G400-TV
Marvel G400-TV
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Marvel G400-TV on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 208 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.