Radeon Pro V520 vs Jetson Xavier NX GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated170
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.78
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGV10BNavi 12
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)1 December 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842304
Core clock speed854 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1377 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors9,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate33.05230.4
Floating-point processing power1.058 TFLOPS7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs24144
Tensor Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Length70 mm267 mm
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA7.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 1 December 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 225 Watt

Jetson Xavier NX GPU has 1400% lower power consumption.

Pro V520, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Jetson Xavier NX GPU and Radeon Pro V520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Jetson Xavier NX GPU is a desktop card while Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Jetson Xavier NX GPU
Jetson Xavier NX GPU
AMD Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 28 votes

Rate Jetson Xavier NX GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.