A800 SXM4 80 GB vs Jetson AGX Xavier

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGV10BGA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateOctober 2018 (6 years ago)11 August 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5126912
Core clock speed854 MHz1275 MHz
Boost clock speed1377 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors9,000 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate44.06609.1
Floating-point processing power1.41 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs16160
TMUs32432
Tensor Cores64432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared80 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared5120 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1593 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2,039 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA7.28.0

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 400 Watt

Jetson AGX Xavier has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

A800 SXM4 80 GB, on the other hand, has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Jetson AGX Xavier and A800 SXM4 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Jetson AGX Xavier is a notebook card while A800 SXM4 80 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Jetson AGX Xavier
Jetson AGX Xavier
NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB
A800 SXM4 80 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 16 votes

Rate Jetson AGX Xavier on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate A800 SXM4 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.