GeForce GT 710 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

Aggregate performance score

Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.71
+557%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms GeForce GT 710 by a whopping 557% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking397908
Place by popularity1648
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGK208B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (3 years ago)27 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$34.99
Current priceno data$81 (2.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96192
CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speedno data954 MHz
Number of transistorsno data915 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data19 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data95 °C
Texture fill rateno data15.26
Floating-point performanceno data366.3 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GT 710 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x8
Lengthno data5.7" (14.5 cm)
Heightno data2.713" (6.9 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4DDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA
Multi monitor supportno data3 displays
HDMIno data+
HDCPno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Visionno data+
PureVideono data+
PhysXno data+
Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.1.126
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 10.71
+557%
GT 710 1.63

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms GeForce GT 710 by 557% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 4820
+409%
GT 710 947

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms GeForce GT 710 by 409% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 38040
+423%
GT 710 7270

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms GeForce GT 710 by 423% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+525%
8
−525%
1440p18−20
+500%
3
−500%
4K35−40
+483%
6
−483%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Battlefield 5 220−230
+547%
30−35
−547%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Battlefield 5 220−230
+547%
30−35
−547%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Metro Exodus 0−1 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Battlefield 5 220−230
+547%
30−35
−547%
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 190−200
+533%
30−33
−533%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 no data

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+554%
12−14
−554%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+536%
21−24
−536%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+525%
16−18
−525%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+511%
18−20
−511%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+533%
14−16
−533%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Battlefield 5 130−140
+519%
21−24
−519%
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+511%
18−20
−511%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 no data

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+500%
5−6
−500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Metro Exodus 70−75
+536%
10−12
−536%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+550%
10−11
−550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Battlefield 5 65−70
+550%
10−11
−550%
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+543%
14−16
−543%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Hitman 3 4−5 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Hitman 3 4−5 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Hitman 3 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3 0−1
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GT 710 compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 525% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 500% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 483% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.71 1.63
Recency 15 August 2020 27 March 2014
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while GeForce GT 710 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GeForce GT 710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2187 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 3945 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.