GeForce 9200M vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce 9200M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.94
+2857%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms 9200M by a whopping 2857% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4251271
Place by popularity26not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.11
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeC79
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)15 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9616
Core clock speedno data450 MHz
Number of transistorsno data314 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data12 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 0−1
Battlefield 5 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+3450%
2−3
−3450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+5700%
1−2
−5700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 0−1
Battlefield 5 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+3450%
2−3
−3450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+5700%
1−2
−5700%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 0−1
Battlefield 5 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+3450%
2−3
−3450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 0−1
Metro Exodus 16−18 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11 0−1
Battlefield 5 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+4800%
1−2
−4800%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
Metro Exodus 9−10 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 0−1
Battlefield 5 10−11 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.94 0.37
Recency 15 August 2020 15 October 2008
Chip lithography 10 nm 65 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 has a 2856.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9200M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M
GeForce 9200M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2549 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.