Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking466not rated
Place by popularity75not in top-100
Power efficiency23.56no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeRenoir
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96384
Core clock speed400 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data36.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.152 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7 (6.4)
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has an age advantage of 7 months.

Graphics 384SP Mobile, on the other hand, has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 86.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 967 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 5 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.