RTX A3000 Mobile vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Aggregate performance score

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
2020
28 Watt
9.40

RTX A3000 Mobile outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by a whopping 247% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking437154
Place by popularity81not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGA104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (3 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores964096
Core clock speed400 MHz1080 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt130 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rateno data237.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and RTX A3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data12 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno data1.2
CUDAno data8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 9.40
RTX A3000 Mobile 32.63
+247%

RTX A3000 Mobile outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by 247% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 6524
RTX A3000 Mobile 25990
+298%

RTX A3000 Mobile outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by 298% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 25394
RTX A3000 Mobile 71308
+181%

RTX A3000 Mobile outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by 181% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 5139
RTX A3000 Mobile 19710
+284%

RTX A3000 Mobile outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by 284% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 26930
RTX A3000 Mobile 29996
+11.4%

RTX A3000 Mobile outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by 11% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
−269%
96
+269%
1440p16
−188%
46
+188%
4K13
−254%
46
+254%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20
−285%
77
+285%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
−173%
60−65
+173%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
−276%
79
+276%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−266%
100−110
+266%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 36
−100%
70−75
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
−313%
66
+313%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−157%
70−75
+157%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−227%
85−90
+227%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−206%
100−110
+206%
Hitman 3 39
−274%
146
+274%
Horizon Zero Dawn 46
−257%
164
+257%
Metro Exodus 35
−154%
85−90
+154%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
−388%
80−85
+388%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 38
−332%
164
+332%
Watch Dogs: Legion 22
−323%
93
+323%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
−216%
60−65
+216%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
−278%
68
+278%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−266%
100−110
+266%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−260%
70−75
+260%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−308%
53
+308%
Far Cry 5 31
−174%
85
+174%
Far Cry New Dawn 14
−250%
49
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−206%
100−110
+206%
Hitman 3 22
−77.3%
39
+77.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 34
−344%
151
+344%
Metro Exodus 27
−263%
98
+263%
Red Dead Redemption 2 15
−453%
80−85
+453%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 25
−168%
67
+168%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
−403%
151
+403%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14
−514%
86
+514%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14
−329%
60−65
+329%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−264%
51
+264%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 23
−213%
70−75
+213%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−291%
43
+291%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−157%
70−75
+157%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−206%
100−110
+206%
Horizon Zero Dawn 22
−418%
114
+418%
Metro Exodus 24
−263%
87
+263%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−336%
61
+336%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−144%
39
+144%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14
−493%
80−85
+493%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−244%
60−65
+244%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−393%
70−75
+393%
Hitman 3 12−14
−267%
40−45
+267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−317%
24−27
+317%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−336%
45−50
+336%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−286%
27
+286%
Far Cry 5 16
−331%
69
+331%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−288%
65−70
+288%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−245%
65−70
+245%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−377%
60−65
+377%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
−353%
86
+353%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−389%
40−45
+389%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 19
−116%
41
+116%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
−275%
45
+275%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−480%
27−30
+480%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−230%
30−35
+230%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−222%
27−30
+222%

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and RTX A3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 269% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 188% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 254% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A3000 Mobile is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX A3000 Mobile surpassed Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.40 32.63
Recency 15 August 2020 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 130 Watt

The RTX A3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 814 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 118 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.