GeForce Go 6150 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and GeForce Go 6150, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics G7 96EUs outperforms Go 6150 by a whopping 20825% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 536 | 1540 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 23.17 | no data |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | no data |
| GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | C51MV |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 (5 years ago) | 1 February 2006 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 3 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 425 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | shared Memory |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | shared Memory |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 27 | -0−1 |
| 1440p | 15 | -0−1 |
| 4K | 12 | -0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 19 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 28
+460%
|
5−6
−460%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 41 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 26 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 30 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+1167%
|
3−4
−1167%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 35 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 16
+220%
|
5−6
−220%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+343%
|
7−8
−343%
|
| Valorant | 124
+417%
|
24−27
−417%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 35 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 96
+967%
|
9−10
−967%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 13 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 51
+629%
|
7−8
−629%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 25 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 21 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+1167%
|
3−4
−1167%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 31 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 17 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 11
+120%
|
5−6
−120%
|
| Metro Exodus | 15 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+343%
|
7−8
−343%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30
+650%
|
4−5
−650%
|
| Valorant | 112
+367%
|
24−27
−367%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 30 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 11 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 47
+571%
|
7−8
−571%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 23 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+1167%
|
3−4
−1167%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 8
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+343%
|
7−8
−343%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14
+250%
|
4−5
−250%
|
| Valorant | 23
−4.3%
|
24−27
+4.3%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 15 | 0−1 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+700%
|
2−3
−700%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 7 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 95−100 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 16 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+1900%
|
1−2
−1900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 18−20 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 8
−75%
|
14−16
+75%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 40−45
+4300%
|
1−2
−4300%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 20 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 4300% faster.
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Go 6150 is 75% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs performs better in 23 tests (92%)
- Go 6150 performs better in 2 tests (8%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.37 | 0.04 |
| Recency | 15 August 2020 | 1 February 2006 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 110 nm |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has a 20825% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6150 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
