UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs GeForce Go 6150
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce Go 6150 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 750 32EUs outperforms Go 6150 by a whopping 7780% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1540 | 742 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) |
| GPU code name | C51MV | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 February 2006 (19 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 1 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 425 MHz | 1450 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 110 nm | 14 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | shared Memory | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | shared Memory | DirectX 12_1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 16 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−6900%
|
350−400
+6900%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−850%
|
18−20
+850%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−6900%
|
350−400
+6900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−125%
|
50−55
+125%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 9−10
−689%
|
70−75
+689%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−386%
|
34
+386%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−850%
|
18−20
+850%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−6900%
|
350−400
+6900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−140%
|
12−14
+140%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−125%
|
50−55
+125%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−343%
|
31
+343%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−850%
|
18−20
+850%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−6900%
|
350−400
+6900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−140%
|
12−14
+140%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−7608%
|
1850−1900
+7608%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−7400%
|
150−160
+7400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−7400%
|
75−80
+7400%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−800%
|
9−10
+800%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−7400%
|
75−80
+7400%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−1900%
|
20−22
+1900%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6
+0%
|
6
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12
+0%
|
12
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 1900% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs performs better in 18 tests (46%)
- there's a draw in 21 tests (54%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.05 | 3.94 |
| Recency | 1 February 2006 | 30 March 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 110 nm | 14 nm |
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has a 7780% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6150 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
