T400 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs with T400, including specs and performance data.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
2020
28 Watt
7.57

T400 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking526470
Place by popularity48not in top-100
Power efficiency18.8421.84
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeTU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80384
Core clock speed400 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rateno data34.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.094 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data3x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
1440p10
−20%
12−14
+20%
4K14
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−22.4%
60−65
+22.4%
Hitman 3 16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%
Metro Exodus 38
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 62
−21%
75−80
+21%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−22.4%
60−65
+22.4%
Hitman 3 15
−20%
18−20
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%
Metro Exodus 27
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 49
−22.4%
60−65
+22.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−22.4%
60−65
+22.4%
Hitman 3 12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20
−20%
24−27
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−18.2%
65−70
+18.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Hitman 3 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−20%
12−14
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−17%
55−60
+17%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and T400 compete in popular games:

  • T400 is 11% faster in 1080p
  • T400 is 20% faster in 1440p
  • T400 is 14% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.57 9.40
Recency 15 August 2020 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 30 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.

T400, on the other hand, has a 24.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 months.

The T400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook card while T400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
NVIDIA T400
T400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 905 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 375 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.