Tesla P10 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTiger Lake GT2GP102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 September 2020 (4 years ago)13 September 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6403840
Core clock speed300 MHz1025 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate44.00358.3
Floating-point processing power1.408 TFLOPS11.47 TFLOPS
ROPs2096
TMUs40240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1808 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data694.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2020 13 September 2016
Chip lithography 10 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU has an age advantage of 3 years, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU and Tesla P10. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU is a notebook card while Tesla P10 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
NVIDIA Tesla P10
Tesla P10

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 151 vote

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Tesla P10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.