FirePro D300 vs Iris Xe Graphics G4

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated444
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data4.73
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameTiger Lake GT2Pitcairn
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 September 2020 (4 years ago)18 January 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841280
Core clock speed300 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4068.00
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPS2.176 TFLOPS
ROPs1232
TMUs2480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1270 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data162.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.21.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2020 18 January 2014
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G4 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G4 and FirePro D300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G4 is a notebook card while FirePro D300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
Iris Xe Graphics G4
AMD FirePro D300
FirePro D300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 216 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 29 votes

Rate FirePro D300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.