Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile vs Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTiger Lake GT2TU104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date2 September 2020 (4 years ago)8 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843072
Core clock speed300 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1530 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40293.8
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPS9.4 TFLOPS
ROPs1264
TMUs24192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2020 8 June 2020
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 110 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile has an age advantage of 2 months, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 633.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile and Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile
Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 59 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.