Quadro T1000 Mobile vs Iris Pro Graphics P580

Place in performance ranking	579	298
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	no data	4.13
Architecture	Gen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Skylake GT4e	N19P-Q1
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 September 2015 (8 years ago)	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	no data	$1890

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	72	768
Core clock speed	350 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	75.60	69.84

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro T1000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	eDRAM + 64/128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.97	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Pro Graphics P580 5.22

T1000 Mobile 16.89
+224%

Quadro T1000 Mobile outperforms Iris Pro Graphics P580 by 224% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Iris Pro Graphics P580 2020

T1000 Mobile 6540
+224%

Quadro T1000 Mobile outperforms Iris Pro Graphics P580 by 224% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	18−20 −256%	64 +256%
4K	14−16 −243%	48 +243%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10

−189%

24−27
+189%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −380%	48 +380%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −480%	27−30 +480%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −275%	60 +275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −259%	61 +259%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −189%	24−27 +189%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −464%	62 +464%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −300%	48 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −247%	55−60 +247%
Hitman 3	12−14 −292%	45−50 +292%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −260%	35−40 +260%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −370%	47 +370%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −338%	57 +338%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −357%	30−35 +357%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −330%	43 +330%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −480%	27−30 +480%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −225%	52 +225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −176%	47 +176%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −189%	24−27 +189%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −418%	57 +418%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −283%	46 +283%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −247%	55−60 +247%
Hitman 3	12−14 −292%	45−50 +292%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −260%	35−40 +260%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −386%	34 +386%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −150%	25 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −269%	48 +269%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −473%	63 +473%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −357%	30−35 +357%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −190%	29 +190%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −480%	27−30 +480%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −194%	47 +194%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −189%	24−27 +189%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −382%	53 +382%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −258%	43 +258%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −247%	55−60 +247%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −218%	35 +218%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −357%	30−35 +357%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Hitman 3	9−10 −200%	27−30 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −109%	21−24 +109%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −3500%	35−40 +3500%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −250%	27−30 +250%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −540%	30−35 +540%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −386%	30−35 +386%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
Hitman 3	5−6 −220%	16−18 +220%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Battlefield 5	0−1	18−20
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	3−4
Far Cry 5	5−6 −160%	12−14 +160%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −129%	16−18 +129%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	7−8

This is how Iris Pro Graphics P580 and T1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

T1000 Mobile is 256% faster than Iris Pro Graphics P580 in 1080p
T1000 Mobile is 243% faster than Iris Pro Graphics P580 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Mobile is 3500% faster than the Iris Pro Graphics P580.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, T1000 Mobile surpassed Iris Pro Graphics P580 in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	5.22	16.89
Recency	1 September 2015	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt