ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Pro Graphics P580 outperforms Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 680 | 689 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 24.73 | 3.00 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) |
| GPU code name | Skylake GT4e | Broadway-XT |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 (10 years ago) | 7 January 2010 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 576 | 1600 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm+ | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 75.60 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.21 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 9 | no data |
| TMUs | 72 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | Ring Bus | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2x1 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1000 MHz |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 50−55
−6%
| 53
+6%
|
| Full HD | 55−60
+1.9%
| 54
−1.9%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+4.8%
|
21−24
−4.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
+5.3%
|
18−20
−5.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+4.8%
|
21−24
−4.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 27−30
+3.6%
|
27−30
−3.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+4.5%
|
21−24
−4.5%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+1.7%
|
60−65
−1.7%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
+5.3%
|
18−20
−5.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+4.8%
|
21−24
−4.8%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 80−85
+2.4%
|
80−85
−2.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 40−45
+2.4%
|
40−45
−2.4%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 27−30
+3.6%
|
27−30
−3.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+4.5%
|
21−24
−4.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+1.7%
|
60−65
−1.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
+5.3%
|
18−20
−5.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 40−45
+2.4%
|
40−45
−2.4%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+4.5%
|
21−24
−4.5%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+1.7%
|
60−65
−1.7%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 27−30
+3.6%
|
27−30
−3.6%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 35−40
+2.8%
|
35−40
−2.8%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+2.9%
|
35−40
−2.9%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
+3.9%
|
50−55
−3.9%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+9.1%
|
10−12
−9.1%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+6.3%
|
16−18
−6.3%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
This is how Iris Pro Graphics P580 and ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire compete in popular games:
- ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire is 6% faster in 900p
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is 2% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Pro Graphics P580 is 33% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 performs better in 32 tests (50%)
- there's a draw in 32 tests (50%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.83 | 4.69 |
| Recency | 1 September 2015 | 7 January 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 120 Watt |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
