GRID K220Q vs GeForce 945M

Place in the ranking	606	842
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.14
Power efficiency	5.07	0.73
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GM107	GK104
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	27 October 2015 (9 years ago)	2 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$469

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	1536
Core clock speed	928 MHz	745 MHz
Boost clock speed	1020 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,870 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	40.80	95.36
Floating-point processing power	1.306 TFLOPS	2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	40	128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost	2.0	no data
Optimus	+	-
GameWorks	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	+	3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 945M 5.46
+131%

GRID K220Q 2.36

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 945M 2108
+131%

GRID K220Q 912

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

27
+170%

10−12

−170%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

46.90

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10
+200%

3−4

−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +150%	14−16 −150%
Hitman 3	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +143%	14−16 −143%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +167%	18−20 −167%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +150%	14−16 −150%
Hitman 3	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +143%	14−16 −143%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	53 +152%	21−24 −152%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +167%	18−20 −167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +150%	14−16 −150%
Hitman 3	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +143%	14−16 −143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9 +200%	3−4 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +167%	18−20 −167%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

+150%

6−7
−150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Hitman 3	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +150%	14−16 −150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

+150%

4−5
−150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+200%

2−3

−200%

This is how GeForce 945M and GRID K220Q compete in popular games:

GeForce 945M is 170% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.46	2.36
Recency	27 October 2015	2 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	225 Watt

GeForce 945M has a 131.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 200% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 945M is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K220Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 945M is a notebook card while GRID K220Q is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.