ATI FireGL V3300 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking636not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.02no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameSkylake GT4eRV515
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)1 October 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores576no data
Core clock speed350 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate68.402.400
Floating-point processing power1.094 TFLOPSno data
ROPs94
TMUs724

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4DDR2
Maximum RAM amount64 GB128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm

Iris Pro Graphics 580 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and FireGL V3300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a desktop card while FireGL V3300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Iris Pro Graphics 580
ATI FireGL V3300
FireGL V3300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 17 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate FireGL V3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.