Radeon Instinct Vega vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 765 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell (2012−2013) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Haswell GT3e | Vega 20 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 (11 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 40 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 392 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 52.00 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.832 gflops | no data |
| ROPs | 4 | no data |
| TMUs | 40 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System shared + 128 MB eDRAM | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | System shared | no data |
| Memory bus width | eDRAM + 64/128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 2400 MHz |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 225 Watt |
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 400% lower power consumption.
Instinct Vega, on the other hand, has a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon Instinct Vega. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a notebook card while Radeon Instinct Vega is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
