Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs AMD Radeon HD 8770M
Comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 8770M architecture, market type and release date.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 8770M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 8770M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 8770M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 1.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Parameters of memory installed on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 8770M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 8770M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 8770M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 8770M, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 8770M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 8.51 +56.1%
HD 8770M 5.45
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 1923
HD 8770M 1934 +0.6%
3DMark Vantage Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 8692 +1.9%
HD 8770M 8530
Let's see how good Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 8770M are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
56.1% faster (about 1.5 times) in synthetic tests
Somewhat newer (27 May 2013 vs 1 April 2013)
Finer manufacturing process technology (22 vs 28 nm)
Quick Sync (hardware acceleration of video encoding and decoding for Intel CPUs. Speeds up video encoding by times, but at the cost of somewhat lower quality)
Advantages of AMD Radeon HD 8770M
More pipelines (384 vs 320)
So, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or HD 8770M?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Should you still have questions on choice between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 8770M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.