Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Iris Plus Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Ice Lake GT3e Plus Graphics Plus Graphics 930 Plus Graphics 940 Plus Graphics 950 UHD Graphics 910 UHD Graphics 920
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Plus Graphics with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Iris Plus Graphics
15 Watt
4.28

T1200 Mobile outperforms Plus Graphics by a whopping 307% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Iris Plus Graphics Iris Plus Graphics
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking711345
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.9374.37
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2TU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release dateno data12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121024
Core clock speedno data855 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate32.0091.20
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3264
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−314%
58
+314%
1440p8−9
−313%
33
+313%
4K18−20
−350%
81
+350%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 314% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 313% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 350% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 50 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.28 17.42
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 18 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 307% higher aggregate performance score.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Iris Plus Graphics
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Iris Plus Graphics Iris Plus Graphics
vs
Iris Xe Graphics MAX Iris Xe Graphics MAX
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
Iris Plus Graphics Iris Plus Graphics
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 950 Iris Plus Graphics 950
RX 5500 XT AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
vs
GTX 650 Ti Boost GTX 650 Ti Boost
RX 5500 XT AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
vs
GT 545 GT 545
RX 5500 XT AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
vs
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU Max 32-Core GPU
RX 5500 XT AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
vs
Tesla P6 Mobile Tesla P6 Mobile
RX 5500 XT AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
vs
Instinct MI350X Instinct MI350X
UHD Graphics Intel UHD Graphics
vs
T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q
UHD Graphics Intel UHD Graphics
vs
Arc Graphics 24EU Graphics 24EU
GTX 1650 SUPER NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
GT 540M GT 540M
GTX 1650 SUPER NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
GTX 1650 SUPER NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
7800 GS+ AGP GeForce 7800 GS+ AGP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 472 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 159 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.