Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs Iris Plus Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking697not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.74no data
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2Pitcairn
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data23 November 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121024
Core clock speedno data850 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz975 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate32.0062.40
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPS1.997 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1365 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data174.7 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 80 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics has a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 433.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics and Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Iris Plus Graphics
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 453 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics or Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.