GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Iris Plus Graphics 645

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Plus Graphics 645 with GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

Iris Plus Graphics 645
2019
15 Watt
4.46

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 645 by a whopping 1652% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6669
Place by popularitynot in top-10013
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data66.35
Power efficiency20.5224.50
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT3eAD104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 October 2019 (5 years ago)8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3847168
Core clock speed300 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2475 MHz
Number of transistorsno data35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate50.40554.4
Floating-point processing power0.8064 TFLOPS35.48 TFLOPS
ROPs680
TMUs48224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Plus Graphics 645 4.46
RTX 4070 SUPER 78.12
+1652%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Plus Graphics 645 1716
RTX 4070 SUPER 30035
+1650%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Plus Graphics 645 2985
RTX 4070 SUPER 68373
+2191%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Plus Graphics 645 1893
RTX 4070 SUPER 48876
+2482%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−772%
218
+772%
1440p8−9
−1688%
143
+1688%
4K4−5
−2050%
86
+2050%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.75
1440pno data4.19
4Kno data6.97

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1450%
186
+1450%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1567%
150−160
+1567%
Elden Ring 10−11
−2970%
300−350
+2970%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−800%
110−120
+800%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1417%
182
+1417%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1567%
150−160
+1567%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−2184%
434
+2184%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−1440%
150−160
+1440%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−936%
140−150
+936%
Valorant 9−10
−4767%
400−450
+4767%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−800%
110−120
+800%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1225%
159
+1225%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1567%
150−160
+1567%
Dota 2 10
−1630%
173
+1630%
Elden Ring 10−11
−2970%
300−350
+2970%
Far Cry 5 23
−561%
152
+561%
Fortnite 24−27
−1085%
300−350
+1085%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−2153%
428
+2153%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1136%
173
+1136%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−640%
74
+640%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−466%
210−220
+466%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−936%
140−150
+936%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1060%
170−180
+1060%
Valorant 9−10
−4767%
400−450
+4767%
World of Tanks 70−75
−277%
270−280
+277%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−800%
110−120
+800%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1058%
139
+1058%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1567%
150−160
+1567%
Dota 2 27
−1567%
450−500
+1567%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−568%
140−150
+568%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1905%
381
+1905%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−466%
210−220
+466%
Valorant 9−10
−4767%
400−450
+4767%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
−4833%
148
+4833%
Elden Ring 5−6
−4300%
220−230
+4300%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−4833%
148
+4833%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−483%
170−180
+483%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3000%
90−95
+3000%
World of Tanks 30−35
−1513%
500−550
+1513%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1350%
85−90
+1350%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−867%
87
+867%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1650%
70−75
+1650%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−5200%
265
+5200%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−6750%
130−140
+6750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2467%
154
+2467%
Valorant 12−14
−2738%
350−400
+2738%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−938%
166
+938%
Elden Ring 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−938%
166
+938%
Metro Exodus 0−1 74
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1508%
200−210
+1508%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2033%
60−65
+2033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−938%
166
+938%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2175%
90−95
+2175%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Dota 2 16−18
−1650%
280−290
+1650%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−2000%
100−110
+2000%
Fortnite 3−4
−3100%
95−100
+3100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4300%
132
+4300%
Valorant 4−5
−5275%
210−220
+5275%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics 645 and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 772% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 1688% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 2050% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 SUPER is 6750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is ahead in 52 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.46 78.12
Recency 7 October 2019 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 220 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 645 has 1366.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 1651.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics 645 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Iris Plus Graphics 645
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 122 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 4408 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.