GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER vs Iris Plus Graphics 640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking699not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.94no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT3eGA102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38410752
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors189 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate52.80569.5
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPS36.45 TFLOPS
ROPs6112
TMUs48336

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data336 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount32 GB24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared21.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data1,018 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 400 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 640 has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 2566.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3090 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Plus Graphics 640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER
GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 304 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 424 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.