UHD Graphics 750 vs Iris Graphics 6100

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Iris Graphics 6100
2015
2.05

UHD Graphics 750 outperforms Iris Graphics 6100 by a whopping 119% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking836622
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.062.08
ArchitectureGen. 8 Broadwell (2014−2015)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2015 (9 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$854 $1454

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

UHD Graphics 750 has 3367% better value for money than Iris Graphics 6100.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48256
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate52.8020.80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Iris Graphics 6100 and UHD Graphics 750 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x1Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus width64/128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.801.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Graphics 6100 2.05
UHD Graphics 750 4.48
+119%

UHD Graphics 750 outperforms Iris Graphics 6100 by 119% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Iris Graphics 6100 897
UHD Graphics 750 1733
+93.2%

UHD Graphics 750 outperforms Iris Graphics 6100 by 93% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−114%
30−35
+114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Hitman 3 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Hitman 3 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Hitman 3 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Metro Exodus 0−1 3−4
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hitman 3 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

This is how Iris Graphics 6100 and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is 114% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 800% faster than the Iris Graphics 6100.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 41 test (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.05 4.48
Recency 5 January 2015 30 March 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 15 Watt

The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Graphics 6100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Graphics 6100
Iris Graphics 6100
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 111 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 354 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.