GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Iris Graphics 550

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Graphics 550 with GeForce GTX 550 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Iris Graphics 550
2015
15 Watt
3.70

GTX 550 Ti outperforms Iris Graphics 550 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking709693
Place by popularitynot in top-10073
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.70
Power efficiency17.192.42
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameSkylake GT3eGF116
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)15 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed300 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt116 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data100 °C
Texture fill rate48.0028.80
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs624
TMUs4832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno data16x PCI-E 2.0
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared4.1 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data98.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentTwo Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.2
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Graphics 550 3.70
GTX 550 Ti 4.02
+8.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Graphics 550 1427
GTX 550 Ti 1552
+8.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Graphics 550 2534
+11.5%
GTX 550 Ti 2272

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Iris Graphics 550 9761
GTX 550 Ti 10229
+4.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p30−35
−26.7%
38
+26.7%
Full HD18
−111%
38
+111%
1440p28
−7.1%
30−35
+7.1%
4K50
+0%
50−55
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.92
1440pno data4.97
4Kno data2.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Hitman 3 7
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−4.9%
40−45
+4.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Hitman 3 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
−25%
14−16
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−4.9%
40−45
+4.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Hitman 3 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 15
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−4.9%
40−45
+4.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−13.6%
24−27
+13.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

This is how Iris Graphics 550 and GTX 550 Ti compete in popular games:

  • GTX 550 Ti is 27% faster in 900p
  • GTX 550 Ti is 111% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 550 Ti is 7% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Graphics 550 is 19% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 550 Ti is 150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Graphics 550 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • GTX 550 Ti is ahead in 49 tests (78%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.70 4.02
Recency 1 September 2015 15 March 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 116 Watt

Iris Graphics 550 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 673.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 550 Ti, on the other hand, has a 8.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Iris Graphics 550 and GeForce GTX 550 Ti.

Be aware that Iris Graphics 550 is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 550 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Graphics 550
Iris Graphics 550
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 53 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 59441 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 550 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.