Tesla M2050 vs GeForce 830M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 885 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 5.59 | no data |
| Architecture | Maxwell (2014−2017) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | GM108 | GF100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2014 (11 years ago) | 25 July 2011 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,699 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 256 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 18.40 | 32.20 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 1.03 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 48 |
| TMUs | 16 | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 768 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 248 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 773 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 148.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | no data |
| Optimus | + | - |
| GameWorks | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 March 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
GeForce 830M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 581.8% lower power consumption.
Tesla M2050, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 830M and Tesla M2050. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 830M is a notebook graphics card while Tesla M2050 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
