Radeon R9 370X vs Iris Graphics 5100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking905not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 7.5 Haswell (2012−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameHaswell GT3Trinidad
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 June 2013 (11 years ago)27 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores401280
Core clock speed200 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1030 MHz
Number of transistors1,300 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate48.0082.40
Floating-point processing power0.768 gflops2.637 gflops
ROPs432
TMUs4080

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data221 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data5600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data179.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.801.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2013 27 August 2015
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 180 Watt

Iris Graphics 5100 has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.

R9 370X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between Iris Graphics 5100 and Radeon R9 370X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Graphics 5100 is a notebook card while Radeon R9 370X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Iris Graphics 5100
AMD Radeon R9 370X
Radeon R9 370X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 105 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 85 votes

Rate Radeon R9 370X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.