RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell vs ION 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared ION 2 with RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

ION 2
2008
20 Watt
0.28

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell outperforms ION 2 by a whopping 35614% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13801
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.1326.91
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGT218GB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1614080
Core clock speed500 MHz1740 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2377 MHz
Number of transistors260 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0001,045.9
Floating-point processing power0.03424 TFLOPS66.94 TFLOPS
ROPs4176
TMUs8440
Tensor Coresno data440
Ray Tracing Coresno data110
L1 Cacheno data13.8 MB
L2 Cache32 KB96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.34 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA1.212.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−34900%
1750−1800
+34900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−34900%
1400−1450
+34900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−34900%
1750−1800
+34900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−35614%
2500−2550
+35614%
Valorant 24−27
−35477%
9250−9300
+35477%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−35285%
4600−4650
+35285%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%
Dota 2 9−10
−35456%
3200−3250
+35456%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−34900%
1400−1450
+34900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−34900%
1750−1800
+34900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−35614%
2500−2550
+35614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−34900%
1750−1800
+34900%
Valorant 24−27
−35477%
9250−9300
+35477%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%
Dota 2 9−10
−35456%
3200−3250
+35456%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−34900%
1400−1450
+34900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−34900%
1750−1800
+34900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−35614%
2500−2550
+35614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−34900%
1750−1800
+34900%
Valorant 24−27
−35477%
9250−9300
+35477%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−34900%
700−750
+34900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−34900%
1050−1100
+34900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−35614%
5000−5050
+35614%
Valorant 2−3
−34900%
700−750
+34900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−34900%
700−750
+34900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 100.00
Recency 3 June 2008 18 March 2025
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 300 Watt

ION 2 has 1400% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 35614.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the ION 2 in performance tests.

Be aware that ION 2 is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA ION 2
ION 2
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 27 votes

Rate ION 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 257 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about ION 2 or RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.