HD Graphics 400 vs ATI IBM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1081
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureIBM (1999−2001)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameIBMBraswell GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data1 April 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speedno data320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data640 MHz
Number of transistorsno data189 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data6 Watt
Texture fill rateno data7.680
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1229 TFLOPS
ROPs12
TMUs112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3L
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.24.3
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.80

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 250 nm 14 nm

HD Graphics 400 has a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between IBM and HD Graphics 400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI IBM
IBM
Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 8 votes

Rate IBM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 392 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.