UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs HD Graphics P630

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

HD Graphics P630
2016
1740 Mb DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
3.10
+2%

HD Graphics P630 outperforms UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) by a minimal 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking719730
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameKaby-Lake-H-GT2Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 August 2016 (7 years ago)28 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$1449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2432
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics P630 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1no data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4DDR4
Maximum RAM amount1740 MBno data
Memory bus width64/128 Bitno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.1.103no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−8.3%
13
+8.3%
4K9−10
+0%
9
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−60%
8
+60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
−14.3%
8
+14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−60%
8
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
−33.3%
8
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7
+16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+42.9%
7
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−42.9%
10
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how HD Graphics P630 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 8% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 0% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD Graphics P630 is 100% faster than the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU).
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 60% faster than the HD Graphics P630.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD Graphics P630 is ahead in 10 tests (19%)
  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is ahead in 6 tests (11%)
  • there's a draw in 37 tests (70%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.10 3.04
Recency 5 August 2016 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 12 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between HD Graphics P630 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU).

Be aware that HD Graphics P630 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P630
HD Graphics P630
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 16 votes

Rate HD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 351 vote

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.