UHD Graphics vs HD Graphics P630

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics P630 with UHD Graphics, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics P630
2016
1740 MB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
3.11

UHD Graphics outperforms HD Graphics P630 by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking769614
Place by popularitynot in top-1006
Power efficiency14.2738.39
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2Jasper Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 August 2016 (8 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192256
Core clock speed350 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4012.00
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs38
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1Ring Bus
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1740 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1031.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics P630 3.11
UHD Graphics 5.58
+79.4%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics P630 1198
UHD Graphics 2151
+79.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Atomic Heart 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Fortnite 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Valorant 45−50
−73.9%
80−85
+73.9%
Atomic Heart 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
−72.7%
95−100
+72.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Dota 2 27−30
−78.6%
50−55
+78.6%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Fortnite 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Valorant 45−50
−73.9%
80−85
+73.9%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Dota 2 27−30
−78.6%
50−55
+78.6%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Valorant 45−50
−73.9%
80−85
+73.9%
Fortnite 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Valorant 27−30
−78.6%
50−55
+78.6%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Fortnite 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Atomic Heart 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Valorant 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Fortnite 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.11 5.58
Recency 5 August 2016 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

UHD Graphics has a 79.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics P630 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P630
HD Graphics P630
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9
19 votes

Rate HD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3
7182 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics P630 or UHD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.