T400 vs HD Graphics P630

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

HD Graphics P630
2016
1740 Mb DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
3.10

T400 outperforms HD Graphics P630 by 203% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking719436
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0216.46
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameKaby-Lake-H-GT2TU117
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 August 2016 (7 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$1449 $83

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

T400 has 82200% better value for money than HD Graphics P630.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24384
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors189 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4034.20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1740 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared10 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1031.2
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics P630 3.10
T400 9.38
+203%

T400 outperforms HD Graphics P630 by 203% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics P630 1198
T400 3628
+203%

T400 outperforms HD Graphics P630 by 203% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Hitman 3 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Hitman 3 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Hitman 3 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Hitman 3 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.10 9.38
Recency 5 August 2016 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1740 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 30 Watt

The T400 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P630 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P630
HD Graphics P630
NVIDIA T400
T400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 16 votes

Rate HD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 363 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.