Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs HD Graphics P630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics P630 with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics P630
2016
1740 MB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
2.86

AI PRO R9700 outperforms HD Graphics P630 by a whopping 2389% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking80717
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.5418.10
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2Navi 48
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 August 2016 (9 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1924096
Core clock speed350 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors189 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40747.5
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs3128
TMUs24256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1740 MB32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.1.1031.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics P630 2.86
AI PRO R9700 71.19
+2389%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics P630 1198
AI PRO R9700 29830
+2390%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−2344%
220−230
+2344%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2233%
140−150
+2233%
God of War 8−9
−2275%
190−200
+2275%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−2300%
240−250
+2300%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−2344%
220−230
+2344%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2233%
140−150
+2233%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−2275%
190−200
+2275%
Fortnite 14−16
−2233%
350−400
+2233%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−2233%
350−400
+2233%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−2233%
140−150
+2233%
God of War 8−9
−2275%
190−200
+2275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−2208%
300−310
+2208%
Valorant 45−50
−2291%
1100−1150
+2291%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−2300%
240−250
+2300%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−2344%
220−230
+2344%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
−2355%
1350−1400
+2355%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2233%
140−150
+2233%
Dota 2 27−30
−2221%
650−700
+2221%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−2275%
190−200
+2275%
Fortnite 14−16
−2233%
350−400
+2233%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−2233%
350−400
+2233%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−2233%
140−150
+2233%
God of War 8−9
−2275%
190−200
+2275%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
−2275%
190−200
+2275%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−2208%
300−310
+2208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2300%
240−250
+2300%
Valorant 45−50
−2291%
1100−1150
+2291%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−2300%
240−250
+2300%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2233%
140−150
+2233%
Dota 2 27−30
−2221%
650−700
+2221%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−2275%
190−200
+2275%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−2233%
350−400
+2233%
God of War 8−9
−2275%
190−200
+2275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−2208%
300−310
+2208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2300%
240−250
+2300%
Valorant 45−50
−2291%
1100−1150
+2291%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−2233%
350−400
+2233%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−2233%
140−150
+2233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−2281%
500−550
+2281%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−2208%
600−650
+2208%
Valorant 27−30
−2307%
650−700
+2307%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2329%
170−180
+2329%
God of War 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−2088%
350−400
+2088%
Valorant 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−2275%
190−200
+2275%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
God of War 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.86 71.19
Recency 5 August 2016 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 1740 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 300 Watt

HD Graphics P630 has 1900% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 2389.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1783.2% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics P630 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P630
HD Graphics P630
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 21 votes

Rate HD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics P630 or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.