HD Graphics vs HD Graphics P630

Place in the ranking	762	1154
Place by popularity	not in top-100	96
Power efficiency	14.32	1.53
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code name	Kaby Lake GT2	Ivy Bridge GT1
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	5 August 2016 (8 years ago)	1 April 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	48
Core clock speed	350 MHz	650 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1050 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	392 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm++	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.40	6.300
Floating-point processing power	0.4224 TFLOPS	0.1008 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	1
TMUs	24	6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	IGP	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1740 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.0
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.103	1.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics P630 3.12
+300%

HD Graphics 0.78

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics P630 1198
+302%

HD Graphics 298

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Elden Ring	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Valorant	2−3	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Dota 2	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Elden Ring	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +325%	4−5 −325%
Fortnite	16−18 +325%	4−5 −325%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Grand Theft Auto V	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 +300%	7−8 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Valorant	2−3	0−1
World of Tanks	55−60 +358%	12−14 −358%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Dota 2	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +325%	4−5 −325%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 +300%	7−8 −300%
Valorant	2−3	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	1−2	0−1
Elden Ring	3−4	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 +340%	5−6 −340%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
World of Tanks	21−24 +340%	5−6 −340%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Valorant	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Elden Ring	1−2	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Dota 2	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Far Cry 5	3−4	0−1
Fortnite	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
Valorant	3−4	0−1

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.12	0.78
Recency	5 August 2016	1 April 2012
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	35 Watt

HD Graphics P630 has a 300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics P630 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.